TCF Writing Task: Synthesis Writing Strategy (Section 3)

Total Word Count: 1,700+ words

The TCF Canada Expression Écrite Section 3 is the hardest writing task in the exam.

Mission: Read 2 short documents (150-200 words each) presenting opposing viewpoints on a topic, then write a synthesis (180-200 words) summarizing BOTH perspectives objectively.

The Trap: Students write an argumentative essay ("I think X is right because...") instead of a neutral summary. This loses points immediately.

The Solution: Follow the "Presents-Contrasts-Concludes" (PCC) Structure and use objective language.

---

Part 1: What is a Synthesis? (Definition)

A synthesis is NOT:

• ❌ An opinion piece.
• ❌ A defense of one side.
• ❌ A critique.

A synthesis IS:

• ✅ A neutral summary of multiple perspectives.
• ✅ A presentation of the key arguments from both sides.
• ✅ A comparison showing how the views differ.

Analogy: You are a journalist reporting on a debate. You present both sides fairly, without taking a position.

---

Part 2: The PCC Structure (Your Template)

P - Presents the Topic (Introduction)

Length: 1-2 sentences. Goal: Introduce the issue neutrally.

Formula: "Le document A et le document B abordent la question de [Topic]. Ils présentent deux points de vue opposés."

Example: "Les deux documents traitent de l'interdiction des téléphones portables à l'école. Le premier défend cette mesure, tandis que le second s'y oppose."

---

C - Contrasts the Arguments (Body)

Length: 4-5 sentences (2 per document + 1 transition). Goal: Present the main argument from each document.

Formula for Document A: "D'une part, le document A souligne que [Argument A]. Selon l'auteur, [Supporting Point A]."

Formula for Document B: "D'autre part, le document B affirme que [Argument B]. L'auteur estime que [Supporting Point B]."

Transition Words:

• D'une part... D'autre part... (On one hand... On the other hand...)
• Tandis que (Whereas).
• En revanche (On the contrary).
• Cependant (However).

Example: "D'une part, le document A soutient que l'interdiction des téléphones améliore la concentration des élèves. Selon l'auteur, les écrans sont une source de distraction majeure pendant les cours.

D'autre part, le document B affirme que cette interdiction est excessive. L'auteur estime que les téléphones sont des outils pédagogiques utiles et qu'il suffit de les réguler."

---

C - Concludes Neutrally (Conclusion)

Length: 1-2 sentences. Goal: Wrap up WITHOUT giving your opinion.

Formula: "En somme, ces deux documents illustrent la complexité du débat sur [Topic]." OR "Ainsi, le sujet de [Topic] suscite des opinions divergentes."

Example: "En somme, la question de l'interdiction des téléphones à l'école divise les éducateurs et soulève des enjeux à la fois pédagogiques et pratiques."

---

Part 3: Full Model Synthesis (Example)

Topic: Should plastic bags be banned?

Document A (Pro-Ban): "Plastic bags pollute oceans and kill marine life. Banning them would force consumers to use reusable bags, reducing waste significantly."

Document B (Anti-Ban): "Banning plastic bags would hurt small businesses that rely on them for packaging. Reusable bags are more expensive and not always hygienic."

---

Your Synthesis:

Les deux documents abordent la question de l'interdiction des sacs plastiques. Ils présentent deux perspectives opposées sur cette mesure environnementale.

D'une part, le document A souligne que les sacs plastiques polluent les océans et menacent la faune marine. Selon l'auteur, leur interdiction encouragerait l'adoption de sacs réutilisables et réduirait considérablement les déchets.

D'autre part, le document B affirme que cette interdiction pénaliserait les petits commerces qui utilisent ces sacs pour emballer leurs produits. L'auteur estime que les sacs réutilisables coûtent cher et posent des problèmes d'hygiène.

En somme, le débat sur l'interdiction des sacs plastiques illustre la tension entre protection environnementale et contraintes économiques.

Word Count: ~120 words. Note: You can expand by adding one more supporting detail per document to reach 180-200 words.

---

Part 4: Vocabulary for Objectivity

Avoid Personal Opinions:

• ❌ "Je pense que..." (I think that...)
• ❌ "À mon avis..." (In my opinion...)
• ❌ "Il est clair que..." (It is clear that...)

Use Neutral Reporting Verbs:

• ✅ "Le document A souligne / affirme / soutient que..." (Document A emphasizes / states / maintains that...)
• ✅ "Selon l'auteur..." (According to the author...)
• ✅ "L'auteur estime / considère / juge que..." (The author believes / considers / judges that...)

Transition Phrases:

• D'une part... D'autre part... (On one hand... On the other hand...)
• Tandis que... (Whereas...)
• En revanche... (On the contrary...)
• Cependant... (However...)

---

Part 5: Common Mistakes

Mistake 1: Taking a Side

• ❌ "Le document A a raison parce que..." (Document A is right because...)
• ✅ "Le document A soutient que..."

Mistake 2: Adding Personal Examples

• ❌ "Dans mon pays, nous utilisons des sacs réutilisables..."
• ✅ Stick to what the documents say.

Mistake 3: Ignoring One Document

Both documents must be treated equally. Don't write 80% about Document A and 20% about Document B.

Mistake 4: Copying Sentences Verbatim

Paraphrase. Don't copy entire sentences from the source.

• Source: "Plastic bags are dangerous for animals."
• Paraphrase: "Les sacs plastiques représentent un danger pour la faune."

---

Part 6: Time Management

You have 60 minutes for Section 3.

• Minutes 0-10: Read both documents carefully. Underline key arguments.
• Minutes 10-15: Plan your synthesis on scratch paper (Intro, Arg A, Arg B, Conclusion).
• Minutes 15-45: Write your synthesis.
• Minutes 45-55: Proofread and count words.
• Minutes 55-60: Final check for accents and agreements.

---

Conclusion

Synthesis writing is about balance and objectivity. You are not a lawyer arguing a case. You are a reporter presenting both sides. Master the PCC structure, use neutral language, and you will score high on this challenging section.